Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lin's avatar

Thank you to those who added comments. I have personally, never used a weather router for planning my own departures. So I can't comment on who might be a best or better person to contact. I have known Bob McDavitt as a friend for many years and know the high regard he is held in for his weather knowledge, his generosity in sharing that knowledge and his ability to understand what sailing on a smaller boat feels like. That aside, I forgot to include one other source of information I use for choosing potentially better weather windows - the Atlas of Pilot charts for the sea-area where I will be sailing. Issued by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), they are only updated about every ten years. And yes, due to global changes, maybe this should be done more often. But over all, they do help show the general pattern of winds, seas and storms we might encounter.

Mats Hoefler's avatar

Thanks for sharing ☺️🙏🏼 this captures something most people underestimate the gap between the “right window” on paper and the reality once you’re in it.

Weather windows feel precise when you’re planning - charts, forecasts, clean gaps between systems. But out there, it’s all overlap, timing errors, and small misreads compounding into real conditions. You don’t get a perfect window, you get a bet that’s good enough.

What stood out is how quickly that shifts from strategy to endurance. Once you’re in it, there’s no more optimizing - just managing fatigue, staying alert, and letting the decision play out. Day 13 of an eight-day passage says everything about how fragile those assumptions are.

There’s a broader pattern here. We like to believe we can time complex systems - weather, markets, even life moves - with enough data. In reality, you’re always entering something partially wrong. The skill isn’t picking perfectly, it’s being able to handle the version you actually get.

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?